PR Quality Evaluator

Based on Slack's code review framework by Roojuta Lalani

How it works

Evaluate your PRs across three key dimensions

Clarity, size, documentation, testing, and context of the PR itself

How empathetic, curious, and problem-focused the review was

Openness to feedback, ownership, and choosing the right reviewers

New Evaluation

Rate each criterion from 0 (N/A) to 5 (Excellent)

PR Title *

PR URL (optional)

Rating Scale:

0 N/A1 Poor2 Fair3 Good4 Very Good5 Excellent

Pull Request Quality

Evaluates the quality of the PR itself: clarity, size, documentation, and testing

Poor

Crisp and Clear Description

N/A

Easily Understandable

N/A

Small and Succinct

N/A

Additional Context Provided

N/A

Summary and Reason

N/A

Testing Information

N/A

Revert Safety

N/A

Linked to Work Item/Bug

N/A

Reviewer Quality

Evaluates how well the code review was conducted: empathy, focus, and communication

Poor

Reviewee Quality

Evaluates how the PR author handled the review process: openness and ownership

Poor

Additional Notes (optional)

Rated 0 of 19 criteria